Top 11 Make Alternatives in 2024

As businesses strive to optimize their operations and drive productivity, integration platforms play a crucial role in achieving these goals. While Make (formerly Integromat) has been a popular choice, the market now offers various innovative alternatives designed to meet diverse organizational needs. This article explores cutting-edge Make alternatives, with a focus on AI-powered, no-code platforms that democratize integration capabilities across entire organizations.

The Evolving Integration Platform Landscape

With the rapid pace of digital transformation, the demand for robust, flexible, and user-friendly integration solutions is higher than ever. While Make has served many businesses well, it’s important to acknowledge its limitations:

Key Benefits:

• User-friendly, no-code interface
• Extensive library of pre-built integrations
• Affordable for small businesses

Challenges:

• Limited customization options
• Not suitable for complex integration scenarios

Considering these factors, it’s beneficial to explore alternatives to Make that offer enhanced accessibility, AI-driven features, and cost efficiency. Let’s dive into some of the most promising Make alternatives available in 2024.

Real-World Integration Platform Use Case

A marketing team wants to automatically save new leads from their website form (Typeform) to a Google Sheets spreadsheet. Using an integration platform, they can set up a workflow that transfers form responses to the spreadsheet.

Workflow: Automatically transfers new lead data from Typeform to Google Sheets.

Outcome: Saves time and ensures that lead data is accurately and consistently recorded.

For more complex use cases, such as multi-system integrations involving ERP, CRM, and custom applications, a platform that is more robust than Make is recommended.

Top Make (Integromat) Alternatives in 2024

1. Noca AI

Noca AI leads the way in integration technology with its AI-powered platform that leverages natural language processing (NLP) to make integration accessible to all users, irrespective of their technical skills. Unlike Make, Noca AI provides several distinctive features and capabilities.

Key Benefits:

• AI-Powered Automation: Streamlines complex integration processes using AI, reducing manual effort and errors.
• Seamless Updates: Regular updates and improvements driven by user feedback and AI learning.
• Cost-Effective: Lower total cost of ownership compared to many other platforms.
• Highly Scalable and Flexible: Easily adapts to various business sizes and requirements, ensuring long-term usability.
• No-Code Interface: Fully no-code platform, enabling users to build and deploy integrations without writing any code.
• Usable for Non-Technical Users: Designed to be user-friendly, making it accessible for non-technical users.
• Quick Implementation: Many integrations can be implemented within a day, significantly speeding up time-to-value.
• Enterprise-Ready: Built to meet the needs of large organizations, with robust compliance features for industry standards and regulations.

Challenges:

• Adaptation Period: Those new to AI-driven platforms may face a learning phase requiring more training and time to become fully competent, but this hurdle is minor and can be easily surmounted due to the platform’s NLP capabilities that enable users to use simple English for implementation.

2. Zapier

Zapier is a well-known no-code integration platform that connects various apps and automates workflows, particularly favored by small to medium-sized businesses for its ease of use and extensive library of pre-built integrations.

Key Benefits:

• User-friendly, no-code interface
• Extensive library of pre-built integrations
• Affordable for small businesses

Challenges:

• Limited customization options
• Not suitable for complex integration scenarios

3. MuleSoft

MuleSoft is a comprehensive integration platform supporting a wide range of integration scenarios, including data integration, API management, and workflow automation.

Advantages:

• Extensive API management functionalities
• Large library of connectors
• Strong support for intricate integrations

Disadvantages:

• Requires a high level of technical expertise
• Very expensive for smaller and medium-sized businesses
• Unusable by non-technical users
• Very long Time-to-Value

4. Jitterbit

Jitterbit offers a powerful integration platform that combines API management, integration, and artificial intelligence, designed to help businesses connect applications and automate processes efficiently.

Key Benefits:

• Comprehensive API management
• Strong integration capabilities
• Suitable for various business sizes

Challenges:

• Can be costly for larger deployments
• May require technical expertise for complex integrations
• High maintenance costs and significant cost of ownership

5. Quickbase

Quickbase is a low-code platform that balances ease of use with customization capabilities, suitable for a wide range of integration scenarios and allowing users to create custom applications with minimal coding.

Key Benefits:

• Versatile low-code platform
• Visual design tools
• Suitable for diverse integration scenarios

Challenges:

• Requires coding for customizations
• Can become expensive as usage scales

6. Tray.io

Tray.io is a general automation platform that enables users to integrate and automate workflows across their tech stack, supporting a wide range of integrations and suitable for both simple and complex workflows.

Key Benefits:

• Supports a wide range of integrations
• Suitable for both simple and complex workflows
• Highly customizable

Challenges:

• Can become expensive as usage scales
• Requires technical expertise for advanced customizations

7. Talend

Talend provides an open-source data integration platform that excels in big data and cloud integration, known for its strong data governance and data quality capabilities.

Key Benefits:

• Strong support for big data and cloud integration
• Excellent data governance and quality features
• Cost-effective open-source solution

Challenges:

• Requires significant technical expertise
• May involve complex setup and configuration

8. Dell Boomi

Dell Boomi provides a cloud-native integration platform that is highly scalable, supporting a wide range of integration scenarios including data integration, API management, and workflow automation.

Advantages:

• Extensive API management functionalities
• Large library of connectors
• Strong support for intricate integrations

Disadvantages:

• Requires a high level of technical expertise
• Very expensive for smaller and medium-sized businesses
• Unusable by non-technical users
• Very long Time-to-Value

9. Workato

Workato combines integration and automation capabilities in a single platform, offering both no-code and low-code options for various user skill levels.

Advantages:

• Extensive API management functionalities
• Large library of connectors
• Strong support for intricate integrations

Disadvantages:

• Requires a high level of technical expertise
• Very expensive for smaller and medium-sized businesses
• Unusable by non-technical users
• Very long Time-to-Value

10. SnapLogic

SnapLogic offers a unified platform for data integration, application integration, and API management, making it a versatile solution for various integration needs.

Key Benefits:

• Unified platform for various integration needs
• Strong support for hybrid cloud environments
• Extensive connector library

Challenges:

• Can be complex to configure for customized workflows
• May require significant technical expertise
• High total cost of ownership

11. Apache Camel

Apache Camel is an open-source integration framework known for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, supporting numerous protocols and data formats.

Key Benefits:

• Highly flexible and customizable
• Extensive support for various protocols and data formats
• Cost-effective open-source solution

Challenges:

• Requires significant technical expertise
• Lacks a user-friendly interface for non-technical users

Selecting the Right Make Alternative

When evaluating Make alternatives, consider the following factors:

• Ease of Use: Look for platforms that empower both technical and non-technical users to create integrations.
• AI Capabilities: Assess how AI can speed up your integration processes and provide intelligent insights.
• Scalability: Ensure the platform can grow with your organization’s needs.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the total cost of ownership, including licensing, implementation, and maintenance.
• Security and Compliance: Verify that the platform meets your industry’s regulatory requirements.
• Community and Support: Evaluate the availability of resources, documentation, and professional support.

By thoroughly considering these factors, organizations can choose a Make alternative that not only meets their current integration needs but also positions them for future success in an increasingly interconnected digital ecosystem.